Cheesesteak miscue

I must have missed this when it first broke, but apparently presidential candidate John Kerry went into Philly a few weeks ago and ordered a cheese steak–with swiss cheese. Read about some more inane campaign trail faux pas from Slate:

If John Kerry loses the election, a reporter once told me, we’ll probably be able to blame it on the mistakes he makes while trying to sprinkle local color into his speeches. The Badger State boasts Kerry’s most famous slip of the tongue: the time he declared his love for “Lambert Field,” suggesting that the state’s beloved Green Bay Packers play their home games on the frozen tundra of the St. Louis airport. But there have been others: his shout-out to the “Buckeyes” while campaigning in Michigan, or his announcement in Canonsburg, Pa., that he would like to go to a local restaurant that doesn’t let its customers choose their entrees, because he has a hard time making up his mind about what to eat. In a slightly different category, but in the same vein, was Kerry’s request in Philadelphia for Swiss, rather than cheese whiz, on his Philly cheesesteak.

Kerry Puts the Gloves On – The “rope-a-dope” strategy reaches its logical conclusion.

I don’t want to get political here, but Kerry must be nuts to order a cheesesteak with swiss. I’ve never heard of it before. In Philly, whiz is the default–in Atlantic City, it’s American (my favorite) or provolone.

Check out this political ad which seizes on the campaign trail misstep. I thought it was a joke at first, but apparently it is a real 527. I don’t know, and I don’t care anymore.

I think it’s kind of silly when millionaires on both sides of the aisle play at being just one of the folks during election season. Kerry seems to have got caught doing this more–when I first saw him snowboarding, I was watching the news late at night and it looked so goofy I thought it was a dream or something. Then, a week ago, I saw him goose hunting. That looked even goofier.

Two nights ago, when I was in Mississippi, I really did have a dream about Kerry–at least I think it was a dream. In the dream, he came into my room, picked up an acoustic guitar, and sang a song (sorry, but I don’t remember the lyrics). He then asked me to vote for him. When I said I would think about it, he got really offended. I then went into the explanation, seen on Da Ali G Show, that in this country, we don’t have to publicly proclaim our votes, and that many people make it a habit to keep their secret ballot secret.

Speaking of Democratic candidates doing goofy things on TV, does anyone remember Dukakis in the tank? I actually met Michael Dukakis when I was at UCLA. He had an appointment in the Public Policy department, and I sat in one a lecture, which was absolutely brilliant. So the next week, as I was on my way to see my dissertation chair, Eric Monkonnen, I run into Prof. Dukakis in the hallway.

Do I say, “Hello, Governor Dukakis. It’s an honor to meet you,” or something like that? Do I ask him about the finer points of public service, or the dynamics of balancing political concerns with budgetary realities? Do I say, “You’ve got a great class. I’m going to sign up next time it’s offered?”

No, instead, the best I can offer is a quick grin and “Howzit goin?” When Gov. Dukakis responded it was going rather well, I shrugged appreciatively and said “see you around” before ducking into the public policy office.

“See you around.” Face to face with a political icon, whose teaching I really admired, and that was the best I could do.

Anyway, he might have caught a lot of flak for riding in the tank, but he was pretty adept at handling a clueless grad student. That’s something, unfortunately, you don’t see plastered all over the TV.

Not a nuisance!

For the past two days, most of the cable news networks have been playing up President Bush’s retorts to Senator Kerry’s remarks about terrorism. Here is the original quote from CNN:

”We have to get back to the place we were, where terrorists are not the focus of our lives, but they’re a nuisance,” the article states as the Massachusetts senator’s reply.

”As a former law enforcement person, I know we’re never going to end prostitution. We’re never going to end illegal gambling. But we’re going to reduce it, organized crime, to a level where it isn’t on the rise. It isn’t threatening people’s lives every day, and fundamentally, it’s something that you continue to fight, but it’s not threatening the fabric of your life.”

Kerry was a prosecutor before he got into politics, and made fighting organized crime a priority.

Bush campaign Chairman Marc Racicot, in an appearance on CNN’s “Late Edition,” interpreted Kerry’s remarks as saying “that the war on terrorism is like a nuisance. He equated it to prostitution and gambling, a nuisance activity. You know, quite frankly, I just don’t think he has the right view of the world. It’s a pre-9/11 view of the world.”

Republican Party Chairman Ed Gillespie, on CBS’ “Face the Nation,” used similar language.

“Terrorism is not a law enforcement matter, as John Kerry repeatedly says. Terrorist activities are not like gambling. Terrorist activities are not like prostitution. And this demonstrates a disconcerting pre-September 11 mindset that will not make our country safer. And that is what we see relative to winning the war on terror and relative to Iraq.”

Bush campaign to base ad on Kerry terror quote

I saw Bush’s speech this morning where he said that terrorism was “not a nuisance, like gambling and prostitution.” It felt great to have the President of the United States refer to the topic of my intellectual interest as a “nuisance.” I can only imagine what Frank Fahrenkopf’s going through at the American Gaming Association.

In all fairness, Kerry did call illegal gambling a nuisance, but that nuance has been lost on most of the news people.

In all honesty, I’m surprised that the AGA hasn’t issued any kind of statement objecting to either Kerry’s remarks or the Bush camp’s spin.

Since I’ve been called the leading expert on American gaming history, I’m sure people are just dying to know what I thnk. Here is my official stance on the issue: Illegal gambling is not a nuisance: for most of US history, it was a persistent illegal market that flourishes because of the gap between public law and personal morality. Today, it is, in most states, a pernicious threat to the revenues of state-sponsored gaming businesses.

If only Kerry’s people had vetted that blurb with a gaming historian, they might have saved themselves a lot of trouble.

Another point: one of the justifications for federal anti-Internet gaming activity is that Internet gaming can be used to launder money and support international terrorism–at least that’s what the Justice Department says. So we come full circle here. Is unsanctioned gambling just a “nuisance,” or is it a serious threat to homeland security?