BWI casino

I’ve traveled through Baltimore-Washington International Airport a few times, and there’s not a lot to do there. This proposal to allow a massive slot casino at the airport might change that. From the Baltimore Sun:

A Baltimore County lawmaker is proposing slot-machine gambling at Maryland’s major airport, but Gov. Martin OMalley called the casino a "bad idea," limiting its chances at a time of slots-related buyers remorse in Annapolis.

Del. Eric M. Bromwells House Bill 777 – the airplane-related number is a coincidence – would add Baltimore-Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport to the list of locations for the casino licenses approved by voters last year.

The bill, co-sponsored by a bipartisan group of 11 Baltimore County and city lawmakers, would allow 3,000 slots in the terminal area.

The idea is to separate air travelers from their cash while they wait to board airplanes, said Bromwell, a Baltimore County Democrat. "If youre looking to capture revenues from outside of the state," he said, "were talking about people from all over the country and all over the world that land in BWI."

Because the gambling facilities would be behind security checkpoints, the one-armed bandits would attract travelers with time and money to burn, and not local gamblers, Bromwell said. The idea would require a voter-ratified amendment to the Maryland Constitution, which the lawmaker has also proposed.

House bill would allow 3,000 slot machines at BWI — baltimoresun.com.

To put this is context, Sam’s Town has 3,050 slot machines. So basically you’re talking about putting Sam’s Town behind the security checkpoints–minus the Shelper’s Western store on the second floor, I guess. I’d be interested to see the planning documents that justify this many slots. I don’t know how many people are loitering near airport gates at BWI at any given instant, but I find it hard to believe that there are 3,000 potential slot gamblers there.

Of rats and machine players

Can people control their behavior? Or, as the Smashing Pumpkins might say, in spite of all our rage, we’re still just rats in a cage? This piece in the Columbian gives a shot at figuring it out, and even quotes your illustrious blogger:

Gambling is an example of variable or intermittent reinforcement. A gambler learns that an action, making a bet, can result in a desired outcome, winning. The variable aspect of winning — a gambler might win three bets in a row before losing the next 10 — makes it all the more difficult to get up and walk away.

But David Schwartz, director of the Center for Gaming Research at the University of Nevada Las Vegas, isn’t ready to apply scientific research done by Skinner and others to all aspects of gambling.

“I’ve got some problems with that,” he said. “Because people really aren’t rats.”

The allure of gambling – Columbian.com.

I stand by that observation–if you’re going to try to construct a theory of why people gamble, it needs to be much more sophisticated than “variable reinforcement.” I’m sure the casino marketing people wish it were that easy, but it’s not.

In any event, my reinforcement schedule was way out of whack yesterday, since I finished 13th out of 14th in the Run-Good Challenge II. After a promising start (i.e., not going out first overall), I made a spectacular exit. By spectacular I mean “making decisions that are more about hunches than pot odds.”

Gambling in Pasadena

Machine gambling used to be quite common in urban America, as this column from the Pasadena Star-News shows:

Pasadena in 1937 was a gambling den of sorts. Slot machines and pinball machines that made cash payoffs were common in the business areas of town.

But change was coming.

The Pasadena Post wrote on March 13, 1937: "The million-dollar-a-week slot and pin-ball racket – which lures the working mans nickels and the school child’s lunch money – appeared doomed, at least for the time being, last night in two important announcements affecting Pasadena, particularly, and Los Angeles County as a whole."

History Column: Pasadena a gambling den – Pasadena Star-News.

This was around the time that the crackdown on California’s offshore gambling boats led Tony Cornero and others to investigate the possibilities in Las Vegas. Just think–if they’d have let the pinball machines keep paying out in Pasadena, things might have turned out differently.

Fake kidnapping, real slots

We had a big kidnapping case here in Las Vegas a few weeks ago that had nothing to do with casinos and everything to do with the standard “drug deal gone wrong.” So I found this story from the Sun Daily quite interesting:

A Chinese man faked his own kidnapping as well as that of his 14-month-old grandson, before demanding a ransom from the toddler's parents to fund his gambling addiction, Spanish police said Thursday.

The toddler's father, who runs a food shop in Madrid, went to a police station in the early hours of Oct 28 to report that his son and the child's 53-year-old grandfather had been kidnapped, police said in a statement.

The man said a woman had called another family member to demand 50,000 euros (65,000 dollars) for their safe return.

In a second call made several hours later, the supposed kidnapper put the toddler's grandfather, identified only as Yimei L, on the line.

"He said he was being coerced by the kidnappers, who demanded the money," the police statement said.

Yimei then made a third call to his family where he said he had escaped but urgently needed money to secure the release of his grandson who was threatened with death.

Police located him shortly afterwards and took him in for questioning. Yimei soon admitted the story was not true. His 48-year-old accomplice, Jiantuan Y was also detained after she abandoned the baby inside a supermarket trolley.

"The woman said that her companion was the brains behind the operation and the motive was to frighten the family and get money for playing slot machines," the police statement said.

The pair will now face charges over the incident

Chinese man fakes kidnapping to fund gambling addiction.

Do you think that guy has a gambling problem? And what does it say when the “brains” of your operation is just looking for more cash for the slots?

Incentivized criminals

Most casinos strongly encourage players to use their loyalty cards when gambling. From the casino’s perspective, it allows them to track play and award comps more judiciously. Players just like getting free stuff. But sometimes they go too far. From the LVRJ:

It turns out there is some money that casinos don’t want.

A Los Angeles couple was wrapping up a whirlwind weekend in Las Vegas last month when Caesars Palace security officers discovered the tourists had played thousands of dollars in counterfeit bills and cashed out to receive genuine cash, according to an Aug. 1 indictment.

Chen Chiang Liu and Min Li Liu were charged with passing counterfeit $100 bills through slot machines at Caesars. They subsequently exchanged the comforts of their resort room for a jail cell.

The Lius possessed more than 400 counterfeit $100 bills when they visited Caesars Palace between July 26 and July 31, according to the indictment.

The couple unwittingly helped security officers with their investigation. While stuffing counterfeit bills into slot machines, the pair played rewards cards, which, experts said, are tied into a database that includes personal information about each registrant, including each player’s home address.

“In this case, what I think got these people caught was their greed,” said Douglas L. Florence Sr., a surveillance and gaming operations expert. “They wanted to get their points, and they wanted to get money. They narrowed down the list of suspects.”

Caesars officials declined to comment on the investigation. But according to a federal complaint filed July 30, security officers identified 13 slot machines that accepted a total of 60 phony $100 bills. After discovering each machine was played with the same player’s card, officers reviewed surveillance cameras and identified the couple.

Florence said any counterfeiter who passes the bills in a casino while using a player’s card registered in his or her own name is either stupid with greed or “flat out wants to be caught.”

The player’s card launches investigators over one of their first hurdles and makes the next step that much easier. “It’s now a matter of surveillance proving they put (counterfeit) money in,” Florence said.

The Lius were stopped when they tried to leave Caesars on July 30, the complaint said. The U.S. Secret Service, which is tasked with handling of investigations regarding counterfeit money, was called in to help with the investigation.

Agents searched the Lius’ Cadillac Escalade and found three red bags stuffed with about $30,000 in counterfeit $100 bills, the complaint said. Chen Chiang Liu told the Secret Service that the money was a debt an acquaintance paid back to him, according to the complaint.

ReviewJournal.com – News – Phony money alleged

You’ve got to admire the temerity of someone who uses a player’s card to document their criminal conspiracy. This might be one of the dumbest casino heist schemes ever hatched, and that’s saying a lot.

Of course, you could also throw in a wisecrack about having your shrimp cocktail and eating it too, but it’s too easy.